Statutory Interpretation Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Statutory Interpretation - Case Study ExampleThe first condition is delimitate as the first limb according to which the defendant did a shoddy act according to the reasonable and honest people.According, to this standard what the accused did was clearly dishonest as she took the ring without permission and secondly, the defendant was not even in a state to comprehend what was happening to her.According, to the second limb of the case law, in order to establish the dishonesty of the accused, it would have to be proved that the accused would himself check that what he did was dishonest according to the standards of reasonable and honest people.In this case, both of the situations are certainly fulfilled as Debbie herself would realize what she did was dishonest as she took the ring from an innocent mortal in order to sell it for her use and purpose. Since, the criminal offence has been proved, now comes the role of the statuary acts in order to convict this person accordingly of the sort of offense convicted.According to the section number eight of the Theft Act 1968, the person is found to be blameworthy of an offence when the person steals and in order to steal, subjects the person to some sort of force or seeks to create the sensation of force being used. In this case, Debbie did not use force but when the defendant awoke created the feeling of fear of death as she told the defendant that if she reacted, death was certain.Hence, Debbie clearly fulfilled the criteria of the statute and hence, would be convicted of the wickedness as according to section one of the same act, the person is found to be unlawful when he or she take property with the intention of permanently depriving the person of it. So, according to this definition of the word guilty in section one of the Theft Act 1968, Debbie is clearly guilty.Bi) According to section two of the sendup Act 2006, the person is found to guilty if he fulfils a number of conditions laid out including if the person dishonestly makes a false representation those include the intention of making the representation, making a light upon for himself or other, or in order to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.In the case of the representation element, the case if proved too false when it fulfils the following criteria it is faux or misleading, and the person making it knows that it is, or might be, untrue or misleading. The definition of Representation federal agency any representation as to fact or law, including a representation as to the state of point of the person making the representation, or Any other person and lastly the representation may be express or implied. In the case of Alex, Clare and his grandmother Bella, all three counts of fraud were visible as according to the first section of the section number two of the Fraud Act 2006, Alex is dishonestly making a false representation of the actual scenario. Though he is actually at fault and is amen able for the accident, has made it the fault of the other driver and is insisting upon the fact that it was a form of revenge on the behalf of the militant vegetarian in order to induce a fear of guilt in Bella. Thus, such a false represent